NICOLAS BOURRIAUD exhibition THREADS: A FANTASMAGORIA ABOUT DISTANCE

Nicolas Bourriaud

THREADS: A FANTASMAGORIA ABOUT DISTANCE   

“Telegraph and telephone destroy the cosmos. Mythical and symbolic thinking strive to form spiritual bonds between humanity and the surrounding world, shaping distance into the space required for devotion and reflection: the distance undone by the instantaneous electric connection.”  Aby Warburg

Threads: A Fantasmagoria about DistanceFantasmagory, both as a technique and an ideology of the image, could be the forgotten historical model for today’s art practices: the way artists embroider stories in a mixture of fictions and social reality, inhabiting the interstices between the real, the illusion, the image and its interpretations, seems to connect to the ambitions of the 18th century’s ‘fantasmagorists’ — their will to include the viewer into total environments that recall our installations, the way they combined scientific ambitions, esoteric knowledge and spectacular practice.

Already at the end of the eighteenth century, Philidor and Robertson, the first ‘fantasmagores’, share some traits with contemporary artists: between enlightment and entertainment, science and magic, painting and theatre, prestidigitation and political issues (Robespierre and Danton were among the revolutionary figures invocated by Robertson in his spectacles), they appear as prototypes for the contemporary artist…  Contemporary to the fantasmagories was the invention of telegraphy (from the greek word tele, far and graphein, write), the long-distance transmission of written messages without physical transport of letters. A semaphore network was invented by Claude Chappe in France, which operated from 1792 through 1846; an electrical telegraph was independently developed in the United States in 1837 by Samuel Morse. 

Threads’ ambitions are both to approach the form of fantasmagoria and to address the way today’s artists include the notion of distance in their works: in a globalized and digitalized world, how does art deal with transportation, real time communication? What is the current shape of the presence/absence dialectics? How do artists present absent realities? “Move bits, not atoms”, said the web activist Nicholas Negroponte in the 1990s.

As a metaphor, Threads also stresses the parallels between today’s art and the spectacle of fantasmagory, focusing on the similarities with this proto-movie theatre both in terms of techniques and intellectual issues, and leads the way to another possible history of art, where feature films and installations would share a common ancestor.

By doing so, it alludes to the spectral as an emerging mode of visualisation anchored in internet culture: furtive apparitions, gaseous, infra-thin or filigree-like images, pseudo-telepathy, ventriloquy or magnetic phenomena are part of a new culture of the visible aiming to reconcile science and poetry, technology and image analysis, but in a production context dominated by digital tools.

Based on this link between science, poetry and spiritualism, Threads is an exhibition about art as a system that connects itself to a different time and/or space.  The artwork as a telegraphic device, entering into contact with something happening somewhere else, in another realm, world, place or times…

Artists of the exhibition: Saâdane Afif, Arnas Anskaitis, Hicham Berrada, Walead Beshty, Roberto Cabot, Attila Csorgo, Bronė Sofija Gideikaitė, Liam Gillick, Lothar Hempel, Carsten Höller, Katja Novitskova, Pakui Hardware (Černiauskaite Neringa & Ugnius Gelguda), Katie Paterson, Amalia Ulman, Julijonas Urbonas, Kelley Walker, Darius Žiūra.  

Exhibition information:
Venue: Central Post Office
Address: Kaunas Laisvės a. 102, Kaunas LT 44001 (II – VI levels).
Working hours: II – VII 11 am – 7 pm. 
The exhibition lasts until Dec. 31, 2015.

Comment

  • Ambon Pereira

    Replied on: 11-04-2015, 00:45

    doubt very much that this comment will post, as i don’t see comments posted anywhere, which is almost/perhaps a charming irony in a show about presence-and-absence-in-distance; i myself am distant, having known this exhibit only in 8-bit postcards, i mean .gifs, i mean html, i mean google auto-translate of the original lith., i mean browsing, surmising, shrugging, day-dreaming. what does it mean to be present or absent in a medium? am presently seated beside a fountain by louis kahn, with a statue by bourdelle 1909 called penelope, the wily unweaver, greek-approximate to schezerade. i see weaving is a theme of sorts, graphical representations of data. counting tree rings. (again, this message will presumably not be posted, and therefore amounts to another exercise in absence). i read and dream of kaunas, sometimes lovely, sometimes horrifying. which is to say like any other history, except that it belongs, principally, to yourselves– but what does it mean to belong to yourself on the web, dissolving, surveilled, mined, summarized and abbreviated and mistranslated? i dream of that first telegraph, presumably by way of germany from london with russia and persia and india as its objective. copper and gutta percha and electrons, the carrington event. trivia, unrelated except in a mind, a mined mind. good luck to lithuania, good luck art and the people

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

gayrawclub.com gonzoporn.org novibo.com